Jill Craybas vs Natalie Grandin Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Craybas vs N. Grandin

Jill Craybas

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.60m

Height

1.75m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$665.1K

Career Money

$53.3K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Left-handed (two-handed backhand)

Natalie Grandin

RSA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.60m

Height

1.75m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$665.1K

Career Money

$53.3K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Left-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-To-Head: Craybas 2 - 0 Grandin

They have played 4 sets in total, with Jill Craybas winning 4 and Natalie Grandin winning 0. The last match between Jill Craybas and Natalie Grandin was at the HP Japan Women's Open Tennis 2010 - Osaka, 12-10-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jill Craybas getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Craybas	2
Grandin	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) HP Japan Women's Open Tennis 2010 - Osaka(10-12-10)

Stats

Jill Craybas

Natalie Grandin

(R2) St. Paul(02-21-05)

Stats

Jill Craybas

Natalie Grandin

J. Craybas vs N. Grandin H2H Profile

J. Craybas	Stats	N. Grandin
$665,086	Career Prize Money	$53,305
46.08% (347-406)	Career Total W/L	47.13% (197-221)
1	Hard	0
1	Indoor	0
3	Titles	3
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Craybas vs N. Grandin Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jill Craybas has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Natalie Grandin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jill Craybas, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natalie Grandin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jill Craybas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natalie Grandin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jill Craybas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Natalie Grandin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jill Craybas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/ 37). Natalie Grandin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 132/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
Player level: In the last year, Jill Craybas has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Natalie Grandin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jill Craybas winning 2 times and Natalie Grandin being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jill Craybas winning 4 and Natalie Grandin winning 0. The last match between Jill Craybas and Natalie Grandin was at the HP Japan Women's Open Tennis 2010 - Osaka, 12-10-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jill Craybas getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:35:30.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jill Craybas has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Natalie Grandin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jill Craybas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natalie Grandin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jill Craybas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natalie Grandin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jill Craybas vs Natalie Grandin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Craybas vs N. Grandin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Craybas	Stats	N. Grandin
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	14
3	Aces (Total)	1
1	Total Double Faults	0
0:35:30	Avg. Match Time	0:35:30
63% (33/52)	1st Serve %	77% (40/52)
73% (24/33)	1st Serve Win %	55% (22/40)
63% (12/19)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (6/12)
57% (4/7)	Break Pts Won %	100% (1/1)
46% (24/52)	Return Pts Won %	31% (16/52)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Craybas Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Mercury Insurance Open - Carlsbad - 29-07-2013
Q1 Julia BoserupJ. Boserup	L	6-3 2-6 6-4	Stats
AEGON International - Eastbourne - 17-06-2013
Q1 Kristyna PliskovaK. Pliskova	L	6-7(3) 6-1 6-3	Stats
Nurnberger Versicherungscup - Nurnberg - 10-06-2013
Q2 Marina MelnikovaM. Melnikova	L	6-4 6-7(5) 6-2	Stats
Q1 Magda LinetteM. Linette	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Marseille - 03-06-2013
Q3 Irina RamialisonI. Ramialison	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Grandin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rogers Cup - Toronto - 05-08-2013
Q1 Kiki BertensK. Bertens	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Mercury Insurance Open - Carlsbad - 29-07-2013
Q1 Sachia VickeryS. Vickery	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Bank of the West Classic - Stanford - 22-07-2013
Q3 Michelle Larcher De BritoM. Larcher	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q2 Sachie IshizuS. Ishizu	W	6-4 6-7(7) 7-5	Stats
Q1 Miki MiyamuraM. Miyamura	W	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Craybas vs N. Grandin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Craybas	Stats	N. Grandin
45.83% (341/403)	YTD Win/Loss	47.47% (197/218)
46.87% (816/925)	Sets Win/Loss	48.80% (467/490)
48.65% (7778/8209)	Games Win/Loss	49.53% (4366/4448)
46.95% (177/200)	Hard Win/Loss	51.56% (132/124)
43.15% (85/112)	Clay Win/Loss	41.30% (38/54)
51.35% (57/54)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.90% (18/23)
37.29% (22/37)	Grass Win/Loss	34.62% (9/17)
0.04	Aces Per Game	0.04
275	Aces Total	186
0.12	Double Faults Per Game	0.05
967	Total Double Faults	195
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
506.47	Average Opponent Rank	523.73
64% (15048/23422)	1st Serve %	63% (3813/6044)
58% (8660/15048)	1st Serve Win %	60% (2269/3813)
45% (3761/8375)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (1046/2233)
46% (1313/2862)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (303/714)
45% (10398/23139)	Return Points Win %	43% (2615/6080)
32.53% (27/56)	Slam W/L	43.59% (17/22)
47.66% (61/67)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/8)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
45.96% (199/234)	Main Tour W/L	42.04% (66/91)
56.52% (52/40)	Challenger W/L	53.92% (110/94)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	75.00% (3/1)
46% (335/736)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (195/411)
100% (5/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
54% (84/155)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (46/90)
47% (116/249)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (56/131)
82% (337/277)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (215/168)
18% (337/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (215/46)
16% (407/65)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (200/29)